Free shipping over $250


The Biome Series



Use coupon code WELCOME10 for 10% off your first order.

Cart 0

Congratulations! Your order qualifies for free shipping You are $150 away from free shipping.
Sorry, looks like we don't have enough of this product.

Pair with
Is this a gift?
Subtotal Free
Shipping, taxes, and discount codes are calculated at checkout

Your Cart is Empty

Hampton & Lake Research Lab

The Fabric Evidence

We study the materials that sit against skin through long rounds, hot walks, and repeated wear. This page collects the outside research and material thinking shaping our standard for natural-forward golfwear.

Golf is played for hours in the sun. What touches the body that long should be chosen with more care than plastic sold as performance.

01

Microfibers Supported

Synthetic clothing sheds fibers during wear.

Wear, friction, movement

Finding

Most conversations about microfibers focus on laundry. The missing part is wear. Research from the University of Plymouth found polyester garments can release measurable fibers during normal use, not only in the wash.

That matters because a golf polo is a movement garment. It rubs at the collar, shoulder, chest, and back for hours at a time, often in heat and sweat.

What this changes

We use this research as a starting point for material selection. The goal is not to make fear-based claims. The goal is to ask a better question: if the garment spends four hours against the body, what should it be made from?

02

Fiber origin Material standard

Performance can begin with a cellulosic fiber.

Cellulosic fiber base

Finding

Lyocell is a regenerated cellulosic fiber, commonly made from wood pulp. TENCEL Lyocell is known for a smooth handfeel, moisture management, and a production process designed around solvent recovery.

For Hampton & Lake, the point is not simply that a fabric is natural. It is that the fiber sits closer to the body’s expectation of softness, breathability, and quiet contact.

What this changes

This is why the Biome Series begins with a Tencel-rich jersey instead of a typical shiny synthetic performance knit. We want the polo to move like performance clothing, but feel less like plastic against skin.

03

Environment Supported

Synthetic textiles are part of the microplastic problem.

Material after-use

Finding

The European Environment Agency identifies synthetic textiles as a meaningful source of microplastics released into oceans. Estimates vary, but the direction is clear: clothing is part of the plastic conversation.

Golfwear has largely ignored this. The category talks about stretch, dry time, and logos. It rarely talks about what the garment sheds through repeated wear and care.

What this changes

Our material direction does not pretend one polo solves a global issue. It sets a standard: fewer petroleum-first assumptions, more natural-forward performance development, and a preference for fabrics that make sense beyond the sales floor.

04

Textile design Supported

Fabric construction changes how a garment behaves.

Yarn, construction, finish

Finding

Textile research shows that fiber choice is only one part of the problem. Yarn, fabric construction, cutting, finishing, and garment edges can all influence how much a textile sheds.

This is why fabric development is not just choosing a fiber name from a mill book. The structure has to hold shape, recover through motion, sit cleanly on the body, and keep the surface quiet.

What this changes

For golf, this means testing fabric hand, collar behavior, shoulder movement, drape, opacity, recovery, and how the surface looks in sunlight. A premium polo should not shine like gymwear after the first swing.

06

Skin contact Emerging

Heat and sweat change the fabric conversation.

Heat, sweat, contact

Finding

Studies using artificial sweat have shown that certain substances associated with textile production can migrate out of fabric under skin-contact conditions. The science is specific, but the design implication is broad: sweat is not neutral.

Golf is played in warm conditions, often with sunscreen, friction, and long wear time. A polo is not just seen by the body. It is experienced by the body.

What this changes

We do not claim every synthetic shirt is dangerous. We do believe clothing worn for hours against skin deserves a more careful material standard than plastic-first performance.

07

Dermal exposure Emerging

Skin contact is part of material performance.

The surface against skin

Finding

Research on textile-related chemicals has shown that some compounds can be released from fabric and penetrate skin models. This does not mean every garment has the same risk. It means the surface of clothing deserves scrutiny.

Performance is usually described through stretch, dry time, and durability. For us, performance also includes the way fabric behaves on skin through heat, sweat, and repeated wear.

What this changes

The Biome standard is built around contact: soft handfeel, breathable surface, quiet structure, and a reduced reliance on the slick synthetic touch that dominates modern golfwear.

Hampton & Lake standard

The body knows the difference.

Our lab is not a medical claim. It is a material discipline. We build from fibers, handfeel, structure, sunlight, sweat, and long wear time because golf clothing should be judged by how it lives on the body, not how technical it sounds on a hangtag.

Hampton & Lake is not a medical institution. This page summarizes third-party research and internal material principles that inform our design philosophy. It does not claim to diagnose, treat, or prevent any condition.